Music piracy opens up new technological innovations and new conversations. The latest one doing the rounds is the battle against piracy on the SMARTPHONE. The music industry trade group, the International Federation of the Phonographic Industry, (IFPI) called it an “emerging and as-yet-unquantified threat”.
It’s the same old argument.
One thing that is certain is that the SMARTPHONE is here to stay. That is why the “Music Maniac” app has been downloaded more than 10 million times. So why can’t the music industry innovate and have an app that is downloaded 10 million times.
The music industry of course have sent notices to Google requesting the apps removal. How typical. What’s next? Ban the smartphone because it enables song piracy. Ban cars because they kill people. This is progression. It is a new frontier.
In the UK, politicians decided to tax digital downloads. So this would mean a price increase for music.
A price increase in digital downloads will lead legitimate music customers to streaming and the more casual ones to piracy.
In my opinion this is a stupid decision by a Government that acts like a police force for the Entertainment industries.
Don’t mistake this tax for what it really is. A protectionist tax for the brick and mortar stores who think of their profit margins instead of their customers.
Bring back the CD’s screams the British Government.
Piracy in China is huge.
Not because that the Chinese don’t want to pay for it, its just that China audiences don’t have access to a lot of legal alternatives that are worth it.
So with Nokia launching a very OVERDUE streaming service in China, it is a step in the right direction to monetise that pirate money into legitamite money.
Nokia’s service will provide a legal alternative for free or a premium version for the equivalent of $3.99 a month.
Music industry group IFPI believes it is time to expand the web site blockades to other countries, and censor mobile networks too.
It looks more like censorship to me.
Anyone heard of Hatchet.
“Hatchet is a place (website) where users can share music, tastes and thoughts against one or more music services – and be portable across them.”
This is tech companies innovating to stay ahead of their competitors and it is no surprise that the announcement by Hatchet came shortly after Spotify acquired music technology firm The Echo Nest.
The everlasting saga of MP3Tunes and it’s founder Michael Robertson took another drastic turn in the courts. The whole lawsuit was another case of the record labels just being generally angry about innovation.
While MP3Tunes initially, won, the case went around the blocks and now the judge in the MP3Tunes case withdrew the original ruling and decided to take another look. That’s now resulted in a jury apparently finding that MP3Tunes was “willfully blind” to infringement.
So a jury now decides Copyright Law. Who would have thought that when Copyright was first introduced?
Maybe we should start charging all of the car makers for their cars being used in drive by shootings and drug trafficking.
The eventual endgame for the Entertainment Industry is to reduce the internet to a distribution model that is under their control where the flow of all content is all about paywalls.
BitTorrent and Music is normally associated with piracy, so of course you always need someone to show how it can be used for something different.
Moby showed last year that being the most downloaded torrent is a good thing.
This year we have a Hip Hop artist leading the way with a world first BitTorrent / Bitcoin venture, alongside their regular iTunes offering. And all donations go directly to the band as there are no middlemen.
So what do we own when it comes to music these days. According to a US politician, we own nothing.
According to this moron, the mp3 that we buy from iTunes is not really ours.
Of course Rep Nadler’s fifth largest campaign donor is…
Drum roll please…..
The courts are finally realising that an IP address does not identify a person.
Copyright troll’s like to use IP addresses as evidence to ask courts to issue subpoenas so they can get their hands on account details from ISPs. The problem with that, is that the person listed as the account holder is often not the person who downloaded the infringing material.
So it is good to see that judges are using some common sense.
Rightscorp is still in the news. It is a copyright troll that is purely there to shakedown people.
None of that money will ever go back to the creator of said works. It’s whole business model is built on identifying IP addresses and then sending notices to the ISP provider so that they could forward it over to their customer.
Music streaming services have taken in over $1 billion in sales worldwide. This is a big positive for the music industry. Let’s hope that the record labels dont kill it, by strangling the payments back to artists.
People still complain about the difference between analog dollars and digital dollars.
It’s good to see that Billboard is trying to remain relevant however it could be too little too late. Their latest piece of innovation is charting the chatter that happens on Twitter when it comes to music.
Of course, it wouldn’t be just Billboard taking this project on. Twitter and Billboard announced that they plan to create the Billboard Twitter Real-Time Charts: which is a continuously updated list of the songs being discussed and shared the most on Twitter in the United States.
This whole notion of a piracy tax. Italy is another country that is bringing it in.
The levy applies to any piece of hardware that can hold photographic or video material – whether that’s stand-alone storage or the hard drive of a device. In exchange for the fee, consumers are able to make private copies of copyrighted works they own — films, music and so on — for their own personal use.
So by having a piracy tax in Italy, does that no mean that uploading and downloading copyrighted works is now legal. Because hey the Entertainment industry cant have it both ways.