It’s all about the money in music and the lawsuits which come about because of it.
THE GREAT 78 PROJECT
The “Great 78 Project” from the Internet Archive is digitizing 78-rpm records from the early 1900s until the 1950s.
78rpm records are some of the earliest musical recordings, and were produced from 1898 through the 1950s when they were replaced by 33 1/3rpm and 45rpm vinyl records.
The Archives asked people to donate their albums so that the cultural past survives for future generations to study and enjoy.
At the moment the collection is at 400,000 plus recordings. The majority of these 78s are forgotten and the 78rpm versions are not on streaming services.
Sounds great right. Preserve some cultural history from donated records and provide access to people to enjoy.
But the labels don’t get paid when this happens and suddenly don’t like it.
Universal, Sony and other labels (as part of the RIAA) are suing for copyright infringement.
The labels’ have used colorful phrases to describe the “78 Project”, as an “illegal record store”.
From the 400K plus songs, the labels named close to 3K sound-recording copyrights that the Archive allegedly infringed.
And they want $412 million for it because as far as the labels are concerned the music is available on streaming services.
The Great78 project, is not a substitute for music streaming services like Spotify or Apple Music.
When you listen to it, you hear that the music was digitized from the 78rpm record.
You get the crackle and the hiss of the record. It is a totally different version from the clean remastered versions you hear on music streaming services.
It’s ridiculous that it’s even an issue.
SIRIUS XM
SoundExchange, is responsible for collecting and distributing digital music royalties.
Sirius XM is responsible for playing music and paying digital royalties.
SoundExchange claims that Sirius XM is performing some creative accounting by inflating the revenue from its webcasts so it pays less in music royalties to the tune of $150 million.
Isn’t it funny how the labels and publishers go straight to litigation when someone else like Sirius XM does the exact same thing that they did to artists for 80 plus years.
Twitter/X
Twitter/X users put up snippets of live concerts, music videos, interviews and basically themselves jamming to their favorite music or playing the vinyl or CD of their favorite music.
Posts like these.
Or something like this.
The users on other social media sites do the same thing.
But the RIAA, the labels lobbyist and litigation arm don’t like it.
They have accused X Corp of breeding mass copyright infringement because the company fails to respond to takedown notices and lacks a proper termination policy.
For this crime, the labels want $250 million from X Corp.
Elon Musk wants the case dismissed and his legal team have asked the courts to consider it as the labels have no hard proof of any wrong doing.
$3 MILLION PER HOUR
It’s the combined amount of how much the labels made in the first six months of 2023.
And they made that money because they have schemed, paid or legislated their way into owning the rights of a lot of music.
The music created by artists in bedrooms, parents basements, hotels, tour buses and at soundchecks, the labels now own.
And they will own these rights for the life of the artist plus 70 years after their death. In some jurisdictions, it’s 90 years after their death.
Final Note
The artists who create culture and value are never in the conversation. Even if the labels (and the RIAA) get all the monies paid to them, they will not share any of it with the artists.
And it is the artists who gave them this power to litigate, by signing away their rights in shitty contracts so they could have a recording career. And maybe a chance to make it big.
destroyerofharmony 