Music

Mike Portnoy

I’m not a casual listener. My name sits in the liner notes of “Lifting Shadows”. I chased the bootlegs, bought the club editions, stood in the crowd in Australia. I saw Petrucci and Portnoy together on stages where the electricity felt like a revelation. I paid for that music because it was the songs that grabbed me, not the spectacle.

So let’s be straight: technique is everywhere now. Virtuosity used to be a miracle; now it’s a YouTube commodity. A kid can learn a sweep pick and a double bass blast between breakfast and lunch. What still separates the great from the merely flashy is songcraft, melody, arrangement, that singular idea that lodges in your skull and refuses to leave.

That’s why I struggle with some of Portnoy’s post-Dream Theater output. Not because he’s a bad drummer, he’s not, but because being prolific isn’t the same as being precise. When someone spreads their creative capital across a dozen plates, the best work can get crumbs.

Dream Theater worked because the band added up to more than the sum of parts. Petrucci’s riffing and compositional voice gave those albums a spine. The drums were essential, sure, but they were the heartbeat of something built around guitars, keys and bass. “Pull Me Under” hooked me because the music did more than impress; it told a story.

Does that make Portnoy small-minded?

No.

Does it make him the wrong man for every project?

Also no.

The point is structural: some players are catalysts. They need the right chemistry to make magic. Portnoy amplifies greatness. He doesn’t always manufacture it on his own. That’s an observation, not an insult.

Adrenaline Mob is the closest thing he’s had to raw, no-nonsense heavy rock that actually lands. Those songs hit. The riffs bite. The singer cuts through. That project finds a balance: muscle and melody. It’s proof that when focus and songcraft align, everything else follows.

Flying Colors? Not my cup. The ambition’s there, but ambition without bite becomes languid. It’s like watching a celebrity-level practice session and being asked to call it an album. That’s okay to say. We want fewer filler projects and more full-blooded records.

Now The Winery Dogs. The concept, three masters in a room, sounds promising on paper. But promise isn’t product. When the guitarist is also the frontman and the primary songwriter, the record needs a distinct voice that wasn’t borrowed from other eras. Technical chops are table stakes. The question is: does the music say something new, or just recycle yesterday’s influences?

Richie Kotzen can play, no argument there, but the job at hand isn’t to impress other players. It’s to write songs that refuse to be background music. To front a trio, you need a personality that sings through the riffs, not a voice that echoes familiar silhouettes. Again: not an attack, just a reality check.

And the final point, because this is where the truth lands hard: a career built on collaboration requires choices. Spread yourself across side projects and the core product decays. That’s not celebrity shade; that’s simple math. Attention and intention are limited resources. Pick where they matter most.

If Portnoy wants to recapture that lightning, he doesn’t need to be “the guy” in every headline. He needs to be the guy who brings his full attention to one record, one song, one uncompromising statement that can stand beside the true classics. Focus. Patience. Let the songs breathe.

Because at the end of the day, fans like me didn’t sign up for fills and bombast. We signed up for the songs that make you feel something you can’t name. Deliver those, and the rest writes itself.

Standard

6 thoughts on “Mike Portnoy

  1. Richie Kotzen absolutely CAN sing. Maybe you don’t get him, that’s it. Besides being technically impeccable (at any velocity) and being more alluring live than in studio (something seen only seldom), what sets him appart is his style growth: he developed a unique bluesy, classy style, yet visceral. And, what you said about how anybody plays guitar these days… are you suggesting humans are mutants today? You could have had me playing guitar since I was 3, still I could have never developed perfect playing because that, my friend, is called TALENT.

    To prove my points:

    – Awesome live:

    – Show me all that many people and 5-year-olds who can play THIS rapidly and accurate other than Eddie Van Halen and such. I’d be glad:
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-ZkQ5wC1Zxk

  2. James Balkins's avatar James Balkins says:

    Dude (owner of destroyerofharmony), i would suggest you rename your site “destroyer of all reasoning”. If you don’t straighten out and FAST, your fate will be the same as Chris Cornell. Wake the fuck up…and stop doing heroin.

  3. James Wellington's avatar James Wellington says:

    How do people like you find the time to be this ignorant? Firstly: as someone said before me, technically Richie is easily one of the best of all time, but what seriously sets him apart from the rest is his ability to play with feel, groove and maturity. He doesn’t just rip one the whole time, he knows how to use musical vocab and put it in context. His stuff is absolutely amazing, great riffs, great grooves and mind blowing solo’s. The guy can sing too! He has his own musical voice whether that be guitar or vocals. That’s an undeniable fact. There’s not many people that sound like him. Maybe instead of hating and judging you should actual focus on listening because it’s pretty clear that you haven’t been doing the latter. If you’re a musician you should be fucking embarrassed to carry yourself in such a vulgar manor. You should be disappointed in yourself… You don’t know what authenticity and class are. I’m pretty sure you couldn’t hold a candle to the guy so you’re objectively wrong ‘opinion’ is irrelevant anyway.

  4. Pingback: The Week In Destroyer Of Harmony History – April 19 to April 25 | destroyerofharmony

Leave a reply to James Balkins Cancel reply