Classic Songs to Be Discovered, Copyright, Influenced, Music, My Stories

Who Really Wrote Wind of Change?

Rock history is built on myths. Some of them we know are true, Keith Richards falling out of a palm tree, Ozzy biting the bat, Axl showing up three hours late. Some of them are stitched together later, when journalists and fans try to impose meaning on chaos. And then there’s “Wind of Change”.

On paper, it’s simple: Klaus Meine, the Scorpions’ frontman, comes back from Moscow in ’89 with the smell of revolution in his lungs, fiddles around with a keyboard, and whistles the melody that would soundtrack the fall of an empire. No co-writer, no Svengali, just a German kid who grew up in a divided country, watching the wall finally crack. That’s the official story.

But then Patrick Radden Keefe drops his podcast “Wind of Change” in 2020, floating the idea that maybe, just maybe, this wasn’t a German ballad of hope at all, but a CIA psy-op slipped into the bloodstream of Soviet youth. A cultural Trojan horse disguised as a rock anthem.

The idea is ludicrous on one level, Klaus laughs when it’s put to him. But here’s the thing about conspiracy theories: they’re fun. And sometimes they stick not because they’re true, but because they feel like they could be.

Think about it.

The Cold War wasn’t just nukes and spies in trench coats. It was MTV, Levi’s jeans, smuggled cassette tapes. You couldn’t outgun the Soviet Union, but you could out-dream them. You could sell them freedom in four minutes and forty-two seconds, wrapped in a whistle and a chorus about brothers in Gorky Park.

So what if a CIA lyricist did have a hand? A guy in Langley, chain-smoking in his cubicle, listening to Bon Jovi, scribbling lines about the Moskva River because he knew soft power beats steel tanks? The romantic in us kind of wants it to be true. It makes the song bigger than the Scorpions. It makes it history, not just music.

But here’s the rub: songs don’t last because of conspiracies. They last because they resonate. You can orchestrate propaganda, but you can’t fake goosebumps. Whether Klaus wrote every word or some nameless spook polished the lines, it doesn’t matter. What matters is that when the Soviet Union cracked open, there was a soundtrack. And it wasn’t Beethoven or state-approved anthems, it was a German hard rock band singing about change.

And isn’t that the real subversion? That the most enduring act of the Cold War wasn’t an assassination, or a coup, or a summit, it was a whistle that every Russian kid could hum?

You want to know who wrote “Wind of Change”?

We all did. The fans circling the Scorpions’ cars in Leningrad. The soldiers in Moscow turning from guard duty to join the chorus. The kids who bootlegged the cassette until the tape wore thin. Whether or not Langley had a hand in it, the truth is simpler, scarier, and more beautiful: a song toppled an empire because people believed it could.

The Guardian Article

Standard
Music, My Stories, Piracy, Stupidity, Treating Fans Like Shit

When Governments Screw With Music (And Everything Else)

Raise the price of cigarettes and people don’t quit smoking. They buy their smokes from the guy in the back alley with a duffel bag full of Marlboros. That’s the reality in Australia right now. The tax man thought he was going to nudge people into clean lungs and longer lives. Instead, he just created a booming black market.

And it’s not new. America tried it with booze. Prohibition was supposed to turn sinners into saints, but it made millionaires out of gangsters. The War on Drugs? Same story. You criminalize a behavior, you don’t kill demand, you hand it over to the underground.

Music lived this too.

Remember blank CD levies? The government thought, “Well, everybody’s copying music, so let’s tax the media.” You couldn’t even buy a spindle of discs for backing up photos without paying a piracy tax. Did that stop Napster? No. It just made fans hate the industry more. It turned the record labels into the bad guys and turned piracy into a cultural rite of passage. You weren’t just burning a CD, you were sticking it to The Man.

And those anti-piracy lawsuits? Suing twelve-year-olds for downloading Metallica? It didn’t scare people straight. It normalized piracy. It made Kazaa, LimeWire, and torrents explode because everyone suddenly knew where to find free music. If the government and the industry hadn’t been so hell-bent on control, maybe Spotify would’ve shown up ten years earlier.

Same deal with tickets. Governments ban scalping to “protect fans.” What happens? Scalpers just go underground. Paperless tickets, ID-only entry, sounded good on paper. In practice? Fans locked out of shows they paid for. Friends couldn’t swap tickets. And the black market didn’t disappear, it just got meaner, riskier, full of counterfeits. Meanwhile, Ticketmaster legalized scalping with “dynamic pricing.” The very thing the government said was illegal in the parking lot became policy inside the system.

That’s the lesson nobody in power ever learns: you can’t legislate away desire. You can distort prices, you can ban behavior, you can tax the hell out of things people want, but all you do is create shadow economies. You don’t stop smoking, drinking, downloading, or reselling. You just push it somewhere else.

The record industry thought it could dictate how people listen. Governments thought they could dictate how people live. And every time they try, the unintended consequences swamp the original plan.

Because people are wired to find a way. If the front door’s locked, they’ll kick open the side window. If you make the official channel impossible, they’ll build their own.

That’s the throughline, from cigarettes to booze to black market tickets. Governments and corporations think they’re playing chess. But the public is playing guerrilla warfare. And guerrillas always find a way.

Standard
Copyright, Music

When the Devil’s in the Fine Print: David Coverdale, Ozzy Osbourne, and the Tragedy of Artists Who Don’t Own Their Souls

There’s a special kind of heartbreak that doesn’t come from love or loss, it comes from contracts. From signing a piece of paper that turns your life’s work into someone else’s property.

It’s the sound of a blues riff written in your kitchen, a vocal take recorded at two in the morning after a bottle of Jack, and a manager saying, “Don’t worry, this is just business.”

David Coverdale, doesn’t own the early half of his own story. Everything before “Slide It In”, six albums, countless nights, and an entire phase of Whitesnake’s identity, legally belongs to someone else.

Not a label he can negotiate with.

Not a partner he fell out with.

An estate.

A legal ghost.

“The albums belong to the estate of our former managers,” he said.
“I don’t even know if they still have the tapes.”

Think about that.

The man who wrote the songs, who sang the words, who bled the heartbreak, can’t even touch the recordings. Because someone who never played a note once drafted a contract that said: we own this forever.

It’s absurd. It’s tragic. And it’s normal.

This is what we call “music business.”

In the late 70s, every kid with a Les Paul thought they were signing for a future, not signing away one.

Managers like John Coletta (who handled Deep Purple and early Whitesnake) built empires by owning the paper, not the performance.

Coletta’s company, “Sunburst Records Ltd”, holds the phonographic copyright on Whitesnake’s early masterpieces.

He died in 2006, but those rights didn’t die with him. They passed to his estate.

The music lives, but the control sits in a filing cabinet owned by lawyers and heirs.

Coverdale can’t remix “Lovehunter”. He can’t remaster “Ready an’ Willing”. He can only talk about how much it hurts.

And when he says, “I just forget that catalogue because it’s a sore point,”
you feel the weight of a career held hostage by paperwork.

It’s not just Coverdale.

Ozzy Osbourne, made the same mistake. He signed a contract with Black Sabbath in the early 70s that included one fateful phrase: in perpetuity.

You don’t need to be a lawyer to understand what that means, it means forever. And “forever” is a long time to regret.

Ozzy admits in his memoir that he and his Black Sabbath band mates, didn’t check the fine print. They handed over their publishing rights to “a bloke called David Platz,” who later died, leaving those rights to his children.

When Ozzy finally asked how much it cost him, his accountant said quietly: about £100 million.

He had to sit down.

That’s the cruel irony: the system that profited from his madness made sure it stayed profitable long after the madness passed.

Here’s the dirty truth: the labels and managers weren’t trying to help artists. They were trying to own them.

And the tragedy is that most artists were too focused on creating to notice. They thought the business side was a distraction, that they’d deal with it “later.” But later never came. And when later did come, it was too late.

Contracts were designed to outlive them.

“In perpetuity” didn’t just steal their music; it stole their agency.
It’s like selling your house and discovering that the buyer also owns every memory you made inside it.

The music industry used to run on vinyl and cocaine. Now it runs on streaming and spreadsheets.

But the game hasn’t changed.

The same mentality survives, that art is negotiable, and ownership is a technicality.

Some people think this is all ancient history. That we’ve moved past the days of sleazy managers and unreadable contracts.

We haven’t. We’ve just digitized the exploitation.

Artists today trade away masters for algorithmic visibility. They sign away sync rights in exchange for “exposure.” The word “forever” still hides in the terms of service.

Coverdale’s early recordings are probably sitting in some warehouse owned by a holding company whose executives couldn’t tell “Walking in the Shadow of the Blues” from a Spotify ad jingle.
They don’t care about legacy. They care about licensing opportunities.

That’s what makes this situation obscene: the people who made the art can’t preserve it, but the people who bought it can bury it.

We talk about heritage acts, but we rarely ask who owns that heritage.

Every remaster, every reissue, every “anniversary edition” you see represents one of two things:
1. A creator reclaiming their past.
2. A corporation squeezing nostalgia for one last royalty check.

The law says ownership is a matter of contract. But morality says the artist should own their own story.

No manager should have more say over a song than the person who wrote it.

No estate should be able to silence a catalogue because it’s “not profitable.”

Coverdale wrote those songs in small studios on small budgets with big dreams.

Ozzy screamed those lyrics into the void of post-industrial England.

They earned their legacies note by note, not clause by clause.

And yet, the law sides with the paperwork.

The industry still trades in desperation. Every era has its carrot, radio play, MTV rotation, playlist placement.

And artists, eager for the break, sign whatever is put in front of them. Then they wake up 30 years later, unable to touch the music that made them who they are.

It’s not that they’re stupid. It’s that the system is engineered for their ignorance. And it thrives on it.

If there’s a lesson here, it’s that the devil doesn’t live in the music. He lives in the fine print.

He’s not wearing leather and playing power chords, he’s wearing a suit and drafting clauses.

Coverdale and Ozzy both made deals with devils they thought were allies.

And maybe that’s the real tragedy of rock ’n’ roll: that the songs meant for freedom were always owned by someone else.

Because in the end, the music never dies, but ownership does.

Standard