<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!-- generator="wordpress.com" -->
<urlset xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"
	xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.sitemaps.org/schemas/sitemap/0.9 http://www.sitemaps.org/schemas/sitemap/0.9/sitemap.xsd"
	xmlns="http://www.sitemaps.org/schemas/sitemap/0.9"
	xmlns:news="http://www.google.com/schemas/sitemap-news/0.9"
	xmlns:image="http://www.google.com/schemas/sitemap-image/1.1"
	>
<url><loc>https://destroyerofharmony.com/2026/05/01/they-won-in-1966-the-hendrix-case-and-the-lie-of-a-contract-is-a-contract/</loc><news:news><news:publication><news:name>destroyerofharmony</news:name><news:language>en</news:language></news:publication><news:publication_date>2026-05-01T05:42:00+00:00</news:publication_date><news:title>“They Won in 1966: The Hendrix Case and the Lie of ‘A Contract Is a Contract’”</news:title><news:keywords>music, Sony Music legal case, who owns masters, Mitch Mitchell estate, record deal unfair contracts, Hendrix Experience legal dispute, music industry exploitation, artist rights vs labels, record label contracts history, copyright termination rights, music law analysis, master recordings ownership, Noel Redding estate case, Jimi Hendrix lawsuit, music copyright law UK, artist royalties dispute</news:keywords></news:news></url></urlset>